Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Courts/Law  >  Current Article

Arizona Supreme Court skeptical of minimum wage challenger arguments

Posted by   /  March 10, 2017  /  No Comments

    Print       Email

Glenn Hamer, Arizona Chamber of Commerce

By Ben Giles | Arizona Capitol

Arizona’s Supreme Court justices spent time March 9 imagining a world in which the state’s voters may never get to pass laws by the ballot again.

Justices repeatedly posed that scenario to Brett Johnson, an attorney representing the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry and other plaintiffs in their challenge to a higher minimum wage approved overwhelmingly by voters in November.

Johnson argued that parts of Proposition 206, including new mandates for benefits such as paid sick leave, are a direct mandate for the state to spend money, which violates the Arizona Constitution’s revenue source rule. That rule is a measure adopted in 2004 that requires ballot initiatives to identify funding sources for new government spending.

Continued:

 

 

    Print       Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also like...

Judge rules civil forfeiture case can proceed, legality of state laws at issue

Read More →