Supreme Court takes on frequent flier program rights

Rabbi Ginsberg talks to reporters about his case after it was argued before the Supreme Court in Washington. / REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
Rabbi Ginsberg talks to reporters about his case after it was argued before the Supreme Court in Washington. / REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

By Josh Gerstein | POLITICO

A major airline argued at the Supreme Court Tuesday that individuals should have no recourse to the courts if they’re kicked out of a frequent flier program without any opportunity to redeem their accumulated miles.

A lawyer for Northwest (now a subsidiary of Delta) faced off with an attorney for Minnesota Rabbi Binyomin Ginsberg as the justices took up Ginsberg’s claim that he was unfairly booted from the Worldperks program in 2008 (and denied continuing “platinum elite” status) when the airline decided he had lodged too many complaints with its personnel.

The fine print in Worldperks gave Northwest authority to decide in its “sole discretion” to kick out anyone abusing the program. However, Minnesota law includes an implicit “covenant of good faith and fair dealing” which can limit parties’ ability to take arbitrary actions in connection with a contract.

Former solicitor general Paul Clement, representing Northwest, sounded a bit cavalier about the rights of customers abruptly cast out of loyalty programs.

Continued: 

Share this!

Additional Articles

News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

December 2013
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031