Defining what a disruption at a council meeting is

disruptBy Syzanne Adams-Ockrassa | Arizona Daily Sun

Flagstaff City Council got an update on how to dance the fine line on determining if a person is being disruptive to a public meeting or just an annoying speaker Thursday.

Marianne Sullivan, the senior assistant to the city attorney, gave Council a presentation on the 2013 case Acosta v. City of Costa Mesa ruling by the Ninth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals.

The case is about a man who was removed from a Costa Mesa City Council meeting in 2006 after he refused to leave the podium. He was later arrested for causing a disturbance outside of the council chambers.

Continued:

Share this!

Additional Articles

News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

Friday May 3 News & Views

State Supreme Court reverses sanctions against Arizona GOP in 2020 election challenge The decision overturns lower courts’ rulings and could chill similar sanctions in future

Read More »