You are here:  Home  >  Featured News  >  Current Article

[SUNDAY FEATURE] The not-so-glossy future of magazines

Posted by   /  September 24, 2017  /  1 Comment

    Print       Email

Magazines still line classic newsstands like this one in Harvard Square in Cambridge, Mass. But the publishing industry has faded. /Credit M. Scott Brauer for The New York Times

By Sydney Ember and Michael M. Grynbaum | The New York Times

One evening in mid-September, a gaggle of writers and bon vivant editors gathered by the outdoor fireplace and ivy-covered trellis of a West Village tavern. Steak was served, and the toasts lasted late into the night, the revelry trickling out to the nearby sidewalk.

It could have been a scene from the Jazz Age heyday of the Manhattan magazine set — or even the 1990s, when glossy monthlies still soaked up millions of dollars in advertising revenue, and editors in chauffeured town cars told the nation what to wear, what to watch and who to read.

This night, however, had an elegiac tinge. The staff of Vanity Fair was saluting the magazine’s longtime editor, Graydon Carter, who had announced that he was departing after a 25-year run. In the back garden of Mr. Carter’s restaurant, the Waverly Inn, star writers like James Wolcott and Marie Brenner spoke of their gratitude and grief.



    Print       Email

1 Comment

  1. James Brigham (Bigg) Bunyon says:

    Magazines are the typewriters of today’s communications world: they’re old, slow to react and very cumbersome to use. Yes they don’t require batteries, and if old news and otherwise out-of-date data is your thing then they serve you well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also like...

‘A Love Not Forgotten:’ Suns coach John McCleod and Alzheimer’s

Read More →