Don’t cross this line, Border Patrol argues in court

This border checkpoint located in Arizona is patrolled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents on the lookout for illegal crossings./Photo by Donna Burton/U.S. Customs and Border Patrol

Issue of public right to see what’s going on

By Howard Fischer | Capitol Media Services via Arizona Capitol Times

Federal appellate judges grilled an attorney for the Border Patrol who argued Tuesday it has the right to keep observers and protesters at least 150 feet from a controversial checkpoint in southern Arizona.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick Nemeroff told the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that the entire 300-foot wide stretch from end to end, including the road and the unpaved right of way, is needed for the federal agency to do its job of screening passing vehicles for those not in the country legally.

While the checkpoint was first established in 2007, Nemeroff acknowledged that police tape and, later, ropes, were not erected until 2013 when individuals showed up to monitor what was taking place and protest the activity. But he told the three-judge panel that nothing really changed and, as far as the Border Patrol is concerned, the entire area has been off limits to outsiders since 2007, meaning it is not an area where people can exercise their First Amendment rights of observation and protest.

READ ON:

 

Share this!

Additional Articles

News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

Friday May 3 News & Views

State Supreme Court reverses sanctions against Arizona GOP in 2020 election challenge The decision overturns lower courts’ rulings and could chill similar sanctions in future

Read More »