Men feeling they are being shortchanged leads to shared parenting laws; Kaine Fisher, director Family Law Dept., comments

Christian Paasch, with his wife, Kristen, is chair of a Virginia fathers’ rights group. He fought a long court battle for shared custody of his son with his ex-wife. If the laws had given fathers more explicit rights, he says, the process would have been less contentious. MUST CREDIT: Photo for The Washington Post by Astrid Riecken

By Michael Alison Chandler | The Washington Post

The every-other-weekend dad, born from two generations of soaring divorce rates, was once a conventional part of American culture. In recent years, more couples have been agreeing to parent after divorce as they did in marriage: collaboratively.

Now lawmakers are accelerating this trend toward co-parenting, with legislatures in more than 20 states considering bills this year that would encourage shared parenting or make it a legal presumption – even when parents disagree.

Kentucky this year passed a law to make joint physical custody and equal parenting time standard for temporary orders while a divorce is being finalized. Florida’s legislature overwhelmingly approved a bill last year to presume equal time for child custody plans, but it was vetoed by the governor. And in Michigan, lawmakers are considering a bill that would make equal parenting time the starting point for custody decisions.

“The days of the ‘tender years doctrine’ are long gone. Arizona is also a part of this trend when it recently declared, by the passage of A.R.S. § 25-103, a public policy that it is in a child’s best interest “[t]o have substantial, frequent, meaningful and continuing parenting time with both parents” and “[t]o have both parents participate in decision-making about the child.” This statute does not quite create a blanket presumption in favor of joint legal decision-making and equal parenting time, but my experience has been that most judges are basically treating it that way. My opinion about creating presumptions regarding legal decision-making and parenting time is mixed.  However, as long as we continue to use a best interest analysis as our guiding principle, thus allowing the court freedom to take action against an unfit parent to protect a child’s health and safety, then I think we still have our heads screwed on straight.”

~ Kaine Fisher

READ ON:

Share this!

Additional Articles

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

News Categories