Photo of baby’s butt child porno? No, and ‘unbelievable,’ says Rose Law Group Partner and Director of Family Law, Kaine Fisher

By Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services

A federal appeals court has given new legal protections for parents whose only “offense” is taking pictures of their babies’ butts.

In an often strongly worded opinion, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said there is evidence that two Arizona child welfare workers violated the rights of a couple by removing their three children from their home simply because they had taken naked photos of the girls. The judges said there is a well-established and overwhelming right of parents to control their children without government supervision.

Tuesday’s ruling, unless overturned, clears the way for the couple to sue the state workers who had made the removal decision on their own, without even seeking a court order. The judges said all the evidence showed the parents had done nothing wrong and that the children were in no immediate danger, if any danger at all.

The case dates from 2008 when a Wal-Mart employee, developing photos, saw several pictures of naked children and called police. According to court records, the pictures involved their daughters, then age 5, 4, and 1 1/2, nude and lying on towels.

READ ON:

“I can only imagine how many parents in this country would be subject to criminal charges, and at risk to having their children removed from their home, if this case went the other way. I am disheartened to hear so many cases about children being removed from safe homes over such silly nonsense. Times have surely changed.

There is so much hypersensitive scrutiny focused on parenting decisions these days that it is almost paralyzing for parents. If you attempt to parent while walking through the grocery you can be certain that someone is watching and waiting for you to make one mistake. Next thing you know your kids are placed in a foster home. Unbelievable.

A detective interviewed the parents and asked about one shot which had some genitalia showing, though not frontally. The father responded that’s not going in the album and he would not share it with anyone. And when the detective asked the father why he would take the photo in the first place, he responded, “So when we look back on ’em years later, look at their cute little butts.”

~ Kaine Fisher

Share this!

Additional Articles

Luxury market matchup: Phoenix vs. Denver

By Realtor Phoenix and Denver have long reigned as the twin powerhouses of the Mountain West region, drawing transplants with their booming job markets, appealing lifestyle amenities, and world-class outdoor recreation—but a look at

Read More »
News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

Arizona one of the top states for data centers

By Jeremy Duda | Axios The big picture: A recent Pew Research Center analysis shows that as of February, Arizona had more data centers operational or planned than most other states. By the numbers: Arizona has 98 data centers currently operating — placing it

Read More »

Supervisor Miller joins state water board

By Noah Cullen | Pinal Central Pinal County Supervisor Steve Miller, a longtime water advocate, has been appointed to the statewide board focused on maintaining water infrastructure, Water Infrastructure Finance Authority of Arizona. Throughout his time on

Read More »

STV seeks MAG membership

By Justin Matthews | Pinal Post Key Points SAN TAN VALLEY, AZ — San Tan Valley Town Council voted on April 15 to seek membership in the Maricopa Association

Read More »