Some compromise in property tax, GPLET bill

Critics counter GPLETs are unfair because they offer special and lower tax treatment to certain developers and businesses, but not those who own private property.

Rose Law Group Reporter

The Arizona House of Representatives approved 58-0 a bill adding some new reforms to property tax breaks that cities offer to developers and businesses.

House Bill 2126 ended up being a compromise measure between fiscal conservatives, real estate groups and cities over Government Property Lease Excise Taxes or GPLETs, reports Phoenix Business Journal.

GPLETs involve city governments owning land but leasing it to private developers and businesses who then pay lower property taxes than if they owned it outright.

Cities and real estate interests argue GPLETs are a key economic development tool especially since Arizona doesn’t have tax increment financing.

Critics counter GPLETs are unfair because they offer special and lower tax treatment to certain developers and businesses, but not those who own private property.

HB 2126 centers on GPLETs and downtown and redevelopment areas that cities can designate as qualifying for the areas where the property tax break can be used, The Journal reports.

Going forward cities can only designate 2.5 percent of their total land, or 960 acres, as a central business district. The bill does allow existing designations by Mesa and Tempe to be grandfathered.

 

Share this!

Additional Articles

News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

PRTA suspends operations

(Disclosure: Rose Law Group represents a coalition of property and business owners throughout Pinal County who have worked to bring new transportation infrastructure to the

Read More »