You are here:  Home  >  Economy  >  Current Article

Who really stands to win from universal basic income?

Posted by   /  July 8, 2018  /  No Comments

    Print       Email

Thus far, U.B.I. lives entirely in people’s heads—untried at any major scale./Illustration by Anna Parini


It has enthusiasts on both the left and the right. Maybe that’s the giveaway.

By Nathan Heller | The New Yorker

In 1795, a group of magistrates gathered in the English village of Speenhamland to try to solve a social crisis brought on by the rising price of grain. The challenge was an increase in poverty, even among the employed. The social system at the time, which came to be known as Elizabethan Poor Law, divided indigent adults into three groups: those who could work, those who could not, and those—the “idle poor”—who seemed not to want to. The able and disabled received work or aid through local parishes. The idle poor were forced into labor or rounded up and beaten for being bums. As grain prices increased, the parishes became overwhelmed with supplicants. Terrorizing idle people turned into a vast, unmanageable task.

The magistrates at Speenhamland devised a way of offering families measured help. Household incomes were topped up to cover the cost of living. A man got enough to buy three gallon loaves a week (about eight and a half pounds of bread), plus a loaf and a half for every other member of his household. This meant that a couple with three children could bring home the equivalent of more than twenty-five pounds a week—a lot of bread. The plan let men receive a living wage by working for small payments or by not working at all.


    Print       Email
  • Published: 1 year ago on July 8, 2018
  • Posted by:
  • Last Modified: July 9, 2018 @ 3:18 pm
  • Filed Under: Economy
  • Tagged With:

Leave a Reply

You might also like...

What will Arizona’s economy look like in 2020?

Read More →