You are here:  Home  >  Courts/Law  >  Current Article

Supreme Court ruling expanded tribal land. What does that mean for Arizona?

Posted by   /  July 12, 2020  /  No Comments

    Print       Email
From left: Second Chief Del Beaver, Creek National Council Second Speaker Darrell Proctor, Creek National Council Speaker Randall Hicks, Principal Chief David Hill, Secretary of Education Greg Anderson and Creek Nation Ambassador Jonodev Chaudhuri at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on February 11, 2020.
Photo courtesy Jason Salsman / Muscogee (Creek) Nation

By Debra Utacia Krol | Arizona Republic

In a decision hailed as a landmark in federal Indian law, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week that much of Oklahoma’s tribal lands had never been rescinded, and that the state had no criminal jurisdiction over those lands. 

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the court’s four liberal justices in the 5-4 decision and wrote the opinion for the case, McGirt v. Oklahoma. 

The ruling primarily affects who gets to prosecute tribal members for serious crimes on tribal lands, and it won’t affect non-Indian prosecutions by tribes or property ownership. However, some Indian law experts believe the ruling may lead to more civil and regulatory oversight by tribal governments on land within historic reservation boundaries. 

And it’s unclear yet whether the case can be used by some Arizona tribes to reclaim sovereignty over lands that were removed from original reservation boundaries.


    Print       Email
  • Published: 1 month ago on July 12, 2020
  • Posted by:
  • Last Modified: July 12, 2020 @ 7:30 am
  • Filed Under: Courts/Law, Real Estate

Leave a Reply

You might also like...

Belfiore: Investors are back in housing market and that is a concern

Read More →