Critics say members too tied to builders
By Edward Gately
The Arizona Republic
The improving economy has prompted an increase in large-scale commercial and residential projects coming before city officials and, with that, criticism of the way the proposals have been handled.
A growing area of criticism centers on the Scottsdale Planning Commission, an advisory board to the City Council on land use and zoning matters. Critics say its members, appointed by the council, are too cozy with the development community because most have close ties to the industry.
According to documents reviewed by The Scottsdale Republic, all commission members except Vice Chairman Ed Grant are involved in development, and many are involved in Scottsdale projects.
A commissioner who has a direct tie to a project that comes before the commission typically will abstain from a vote. That has not deflected critics, who say that the members are too close to a development community. Others, however, say the members’ experience is critical for a panel that is assessing proposed developments and making recommendations to the City Council, which has final say.
At least one council member believes membership standards need to change.
Also:
Scottsdale business advocacy focus for two local outfits/Arizona Newszap.com
Planning member will fill Carefree Council seat/ The Arizona Republic
Gilbert residents oppose proposed McDonald’s, banquet hall/The Arizona Republic
New homeowners distressed to learn next-door neighbor is a slaughterhouse/The Daily Courier
