Congratulations: Stuart Ed picked as Pinal County manager

Stuart Ed
Stuart Ed

By Brian Wright | Casa Grande Dispatch

Pinal County supervisors used a somewhat convoluted process to decide whom to offer the job as county manager at their Wednesday meeting.

In the end, Stuart Ed, currently the general services director for the city of El Paso, Texas, was chosen from a field of four finalists to replace Fritz Behring. In an executive session, supervisors narrowed the list of four to two finalists — Ed and Greg Stanley, Pinal County’s interim county manager. Supervisors first said they would enter into contract negotiations with both men.

But, after brief deliberation by the board, the supervisors made a unanimous vote to offer the job to Ed (pronounced eed) even though he wasn’t the first choice of every supervisor.

Board Vice Chairman Anthony Smith of Maricopa initially moved to enter into contract negotiations with Ed. Smith, Chairman Steve Miller of Casa Grande and Pete Rios of Dudleyville voted yes; Todd House of Apache Junction and Cheryl Chase of San Tan Valley voted no.

Chase said she voted no because she felt Stanley was the best person for the job.

The finalists who were eliminated Wednesday were Dena Diorio, assistant county manager in Mecklenburg County, N.C., and Sandi Wilson, deputy county manager in Maricopa County.

“We had four excellent candidates,” Chase said. “This is a very, very tough moment, but I totally support Greg.”

Continued: 

Also: Page city manager candidates down to four

Share this!

Additional Articles

News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

PRTA suspends operations

(Disclosure: Rose Law Group represents a coalition of property and business owners throughout Pinal County who have worked to bring new transportation infrastructure to the

Read More »
December 2013
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031