Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Energy and Environment  >  Current Article

[COLUMN] The clumsy way Congress picks energy winners

Posted by   /  December 18, 2017  /  1 Comment

    Print       Email

Illustration: Rebecca Zisser / Axios

By Amy Harder | Axios

(Editor’s note: Opinion pieces are published for discussions purposes only.)

Congress is doubling down on the least efficient and most expensive way to advance energy and climate policy: through a multi-billion dollar maze of tax subsidies.

Why it matters: The massive tax bill Congress is set to approve this week does little to simplify complicated tax laws that impact the energy industry, keeping intact most energy subsidies totaling tens of billions of dollars. The prospect of a tax on carbon emissions, which would both raise revenue for the federal government and help level the playing field between polluting and non-polluting energy resources, never had a chance.

“You’re just giving away money for no good purpose. It’s a very blunt instrument to change firms’ behavior. Subsidies are just the wrong way to go,” says Gilbert Metcalf, an economist at Tufts University. “Except for the political fact it’s easier to give people money than to tax them.”

READ ON:

    Print       Email

1 Comment

  1. jim stack says:

    He is right, Why have we given big subsidies to Fossil fuel and unsafe Nuclear power for over 50 years with no end in site. Let dump that and go with fair clean power.

    quote=Subsidies are just the wrong way to go,” says Gilbert Metcalf, an economist at Tufts University.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also like...

Fort McDowell elects new members to Tribal Council

Read More →