Too pretty to be fired? David Weissman, Chair of Rose Law Group Employment Law Department, says employment law doesn’t always protect against bad firings

The New York Times

A dentist acted legally when he fired a longtime assistant because he had grown too attracted to her and worried he would try to start an affair, the Iowa Supreme Court has reaffirmed.

Clarifying its rationale for an earlier ruling, the all-male court found bosses may fire employees they and their spouses see as threats to their marriages. The court said such firings were not sex discrimination because they were motivated by feelings, not gender.

Melissa Nelson
Melissa Nelson

The case was brought by Melissa Nelson, 33, against Dr. James Knight of Fort Dodge, Iowa, who fired her after his wife learned of text messages between the two. Ms. Nelson’s lawyer had asked the court to reconsider a December decision, in which the justices said the issue was “whether an employee who has not engaged in flirtatious conduct may be lawfully terminated simply because the boss views the employee as an irresistible attraction.”

That language was removed from the opinion. Chief Justice Mark Cady wrote Ms. Nelson was fired “because of the activities of her consensual personal relationship.”

“This case is a classic reminder that employment laws don’t always protect employees from what may be unfair decisions, or even decisions based on false information and/or assumptions, by their employers, said Rose Law Group employment law attorney David Weisman. “The law only prohibits employers from taking adverse employee actions based on specifically defined criteria such as race, gender, age, religion etc. or specific conduct such as whistleblowing.

“Absent such a specific statutory, contractual or common law protection, employers are free to make employment decisions as they see fit – at least from a legal perspective,” Weissman said.

“That said, even though the employer prevailed in this case, situations involving workplace romances can be very tricky for employers and it is always advisable to consult with counsel before taking action against an employee because of such relationships.”

If you’d like to discuss employment or health care law, contact David Weissman, dweissman@roselawgroup.com

Share this!

Additional Articles

New home sales post solid gain in March

By NAHB Despite higher interest rates last month, new home sales rose in March due to limited inventory of existing homes. However, the pace of new home sales will be under pressure in April as mortgage rates moved above 7% this

Read More »
News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.