Should anti-harassment policy be a rule or law?

There isn’t consensus on whether the policy should be in the House rules or in statute

By Paulina Pineda | Arizona Capitol Times

The House of Representatives didn’t include a formal anti-harassment policy in amending its rules, a change the House speaker called for after an investigation found a pattern of harassment at the chamber.

House Speaker J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, said he pulled a clause concerning a formal anti-harassment policy from the amended rules because there are questions about what part of the rulebook the harassment policy best fits in.

Related: U.S. House Adopts Rules to Curb Sexual Harassment

“There’s an ongoing discussion about the proper place to put the reference to the policy in the rules,” he said. “Should it be under the speaker’s power or should it be in a section that gives members more power to amend it?”

He added that once those questions are answered, the rulebook will “certainly” be amended to to include a formal harassment policy and it will come back for a vote.

READ ON:

Share this!

Additional Articles

Meritage joins Teravalis

Rendering courtesy of Howard Hughes (Disclosure: Rose Law Group represents Meritage Homes and Lennar.) Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. today announced the addition of Meritage Homes to the roster

Read More »
News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

February 2018
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728