[IN-DEPTH] Pinal’s growth complicates judge selection

By Lindsey Collom

The Arizona Republic

Pinal County Courthouse

Rapid growth in Pinal County has triggered a shift away from direct election of judges and also exposed potential weaknesses in a system that has gone untested since its inception 38 years ago.

State law requires the largest counties — those with a population of 250,000 or more — to implement a method of choosing Superior Court judges through a nonpartisan commission.

But the law, created by a 1974 ballot initiative, gives no blueprint for how and when to start a commission from scratch — primarily because, when the state’s population was 1.8 million, the framers never anticipated that any county other than Maricopa and Pima would reach the 250,000 mark. Today, Arizona’s population is 6.4 million, according to the 2010 census.

Pinal County’s population hit 375,770 that year.

When Pinal County crossed that threshold, it also had to expand its Board of Supervisors from three to five members, triggering a series of processes that county and courts officials say had to occur before they could begin work on forming a commission to select judges.

The upshot is that a Superior Court vacancy in Pinal County could be filled without going through the merit-selection process prescribed under the state Constitution. The process aims to minimize political influence by promoting the best-qualified applicants to the bench and has become a national model for selecting judges. The Constitution requires the commission to submit names of at least three prospective judges to the governor within 60 days of a vacancy. If that doesn’t happen, the governor can fill the spot directly.

Continued: 

Share this!

Additional Articles

News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

December 2012
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31