[COMMENTARY] View on rooftop solar misses the mark

solar-panels-thumb-328x500By Barry Goldwater Jr. | East Valley Tribune

Most of the time, I agree with Tom Patterson. We share conservative values. He chairs the Goldwater Institute. However when it comes to the future of energy choice, Tom has missed the mark.

In a recent Tribune commentary, Patterson states, “Companies should be able to deal with solar customers as they please” (East Valley Tribune; Aug. 14).

Tom went on to ask: “Should the Arizona Corporation Commission provide yet another subsidy to solar energy production?” The question implies that solar energy is the only source of energy receiving government subsidies. That is far from the truth.

In a recent study by the Environmental Law Institute it was documented that between 2002 and 2008, fossil fuels have received $72 billion in government subsidies and all renewable energy programs received $29 billion. About half of the renewable subsidies went to corn-based ethanol programs.

Every source of energy gets some tax treatment. Tom and I are in agreement, get rid of all the subsidies. That, however, is not the real world we live in.

Continued: 

If you’d like to discuss energy issues, contact Court Rich, director of Rose Law Group’s Renewable Energy Department at crich@roselawgroup.com

Share this!

Additional Articles

News Categories

Get Our Twice Weekly Newsletter!

* indicates required

Rose Law Group pc values “outrageous client service.” We pride ourselves on hyper-responsiveness to our clients’ needs and an extraordinary record of success in achieving our clients’ goals. We know we get results and our list of outstanding clients speaks to the quality of our work.

September 2013
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30